Viva La Quinta Brigada

The men and women of the International Brigade are to be applauded for their effort to save Europe from fascism, and to save a democratic and constitutional state from the vicious onslaught of a band of internationally backed criminal insurgents.

Historically, conflict and strife almost invariably accompany the transition from a repressive regime to a secular, constitutional and democratic republic. In principle, this was no different in the case of Spain. That this attempted transition came at a time when much of Europe was embracing fascism is perhaps a major key to understanding part of the tragedy that is euphemistically termed "The Spanish Civil War".
 
The Spain of the Spanish Republic was by no means perfect, far from it, but it meant that Spain was a far better place than that which preceded, and that which was to follow.

Against tremendous odds and the weight of a corrupt and oppressive church hierarchy, sections of the army and much of the conservative ruling classes, the republic made great efforts to improve the situation in Spain. Women, of all classes, were free to study and to work, and to take part in society on a more egalitarian basis. Activities previously prohibited, by law or by taboo, were to become simply an exercise of liberty and rights. Education was to become accessible to all, regardless of class. Political pluralism flourished, as never before, regional autonomy and federalism were to become a reality and censorship pared back as never before. Real political power was now in the hands of the people.

It is difficult for people, in this day and age, where many of us see politics as merely another service, to fully understand the dramatic improvements that the republic signified for many ordinary working people and their families.

The Spanish Civil war was the first major confrontation with authoritarianism and fascism in Europe. When it came to the crunch, the so-called democracies were found desperately wanting. After a democratic, constitutional and secular Spain had been isolated and forced to fail in its resistance to fascism, the rest of the drama was to follow. In wilfully denying support to a legitimate government in Europe, the allies opened the floodgates that would eventually result in the millions of deaths, tremendous destruction and the fascist/nazi perpetration of The Holocaust.

A couple of additional things also worth bearing in mind:

1.    The church hierarchy in Spain overwhelmingly supported the insurgents against the established secular state, and was effectively complicit with them in their crimes from the very beginning, and primarily because the Republic, which declared Spain to be a secular and democratic state, lost its hegemony in Spain.

2.    The non-combat deaths, especially summary executions, were not a novelty and nuns and priests were by far the most effected; for example, the insurgents executed many anarchists, later claiming it was an act of the state.

3.    In the province of Córdoba alone, 2,300 people were executed by those loyal to the constitutional state, whilst  7,500 people were executed by the insurgents – in the city of Córdoba alone, more than 4,000 Republicans were executed.

4.    For forty long years, and with few honourable exceptions, the Catholic Church in Spain protected and encouraged the brutal fascist dictatorship of Franco. In that time, many people were tortured, murdered, imprisoned or exiled. Many of those who were tortured, murdered, imprisoned or exiled – por Rojos – were also Catholics, just not the type of Catholics that the fascists or the Church wanted.

5.    The anarchists have not formally apologised for the killing of nuns and priests, yet the Catholic Church has not apologised for its own explicit support of the Dictatorship, during its forty years of repression.
Of course, there is a lot more to the story than just these simple points.

It is to be remembered that the war in Spain was not a question of two bands opposed to each other, but the defense of a democratic republic and a democratically elected government, against a band criminal insurgents who sought to bring down the government and remove the republican system of democracy.

The criminal insurgents and their international backers sought to turn back the tide that had brought in – amongst other things - the separation of church and state; an established republic; secular education; a nascent public health system; greater equality; the removal of the interference of the catholic church; greater autonomy and local decision making in the regions of Spain; and, the acceptance and promotion of a secular society and culture.

Those who fought on the side of the republic against the criminal fascists were many, very few were trained soldiers, many who fought and died in defense of the republic were liberals, humanists, unionists, socialists, communists and idealists; from Spain, and elsewhere.

The brave and legitimate defense of a democratic republic against the criminal insurgence and their mercenaries failed, and Spain was consigned to 40 years of fascism; a damning indictment of the lies and betrayal of the allies in the run up to world war two.


Nothing will change the facts of history, yet it is shameful that people will still salute Nazis, talk of criminal insurgents as if they were on the same moral and legal footing as the established rule of law and the constitution in a democratic republic. To pretend that there is no difference between the democratic state and those who would wish to violently overthrow it and replace it with a repressive, murderous and brutal dictatorship is naturally seen by any self-respecting democrat as both mendacious and perverse.

The men and women of the International Brigade tried to save a country from the grips of fascism. They assumed the work that those who were too cowardly or self interested wanted to assume. The allies opened the door to fascism/nazism in Europe, the International Brigade tried to help in stopping a tremendous and horrendous crime in progress.

¡No pasarán!

Print | posted on Sunday, June 14, 2009 12:26 PM

Feedback

# re: Viva La Quinta Brigada

left by MartynInEurope at 6/15/2009 2:01 AM Gravatar
MartynInEurope

15 Jun 09, 12:49am (4 minutes ago)

Topcliff:

14 Jun 09, 7:19pm (about 4 hours ago)

The Nationalist insurrection in Spain was made inevitable by the Left's own violent and anti-democratic behaviour in the 2nd Republic.

This makes it seem as if there was more democracy before the Constitution of 31, which in fact is simply a false claim. Although the constitutional democracy was working far from perfectly, the fact that the constitution was relatively new and vehemently opposed by disruptive factions on the right, did not diminish the fact that the democracy that prevailed at the time was far better than any form of democracy previously experienced in Spain.

* The Left severely damaged the legitimacy of the state in the eyes of the Right by abolishing the constitutional monarchy

The republican constitution was not simply a leftist cause, quite a number of Republicans in Spain at the time would not have been out of place in the USA's contemporary Republican party.

* The Left further undermined democratic Rightists by appointing a partisan leftist rather than a constitutionally neutral non-executive President.

A partisan leftist? Niceto Alcalá-Zamora? Get out of here! He was as leftist as Richard Nixon.

* The main Rightist party (CEDA) won a plurality in the 1933 but was not asked to form the government by President Niceto Alcalá-Zamora. This proved to the Right that the Republic was rigged against them and that even when they won elections, they would not be allowed to take office. The Republic was not a meaningful democracy, it was 'guided' by a leftist establishment/ruling political class.

If I remember rightly. Niceto Alcalá-Zamora was a conservative republican and not a socialist or a communist, he was elected President by 362 votes out of 410 present deputies (the Chamber was composed of 446 deputies). After the 1933 elections, CEDA did not have sufficient seats to form a government on its own, so President Niceto Alcalá-Zamora (remember, a conservative republican) appointed Alejandro Lerroux García, another conservative/liberal republican, to the post of Prime Minister.

* When the Right wangled a few token seats in the government, Largo Caballero led a violent miners insurrection calling for bloody workers revolution that resulted in thousands of deaths and took the Army two weeks to put down. This was an extremely frightening experience for the Right and it taught Franco (who led the Army campaign) that the Spanish Army could defeat Leftist militias on Spanish soil. A taboo was broken.

1. The right was in government, what CEDA did was to manage to obtain seats in that government. What the conservative republican President Niceto Alcalá-Zamora wanted to avoid was the appointment of monarchist Gil Robles as prime minister. When this looked likely, Niceto Alcalá-Zamora called an election. The mutual dislike between Gil Robles (the monarchist) and Alcalá-Zamora (the conservative republican) was personal as well as political.
2. Largo Caballero was charged with military rebellion, and jailed, the case was reviewed by the Supreme Court, who absolved him of involvement in any military rebellion. i.e. Not guilty.

*Largo Caballero went on the become leader of the Spanish Socialist Party, demonstrating to the Right that violence against them was easily forgiven in the Republic; and that the Left regarded the legitmacy of the Republic as contingent (upon Rightist non-participation in government).

So, this is just nonsense.

--- continued ---

# re: Viva La Quinta Brigada

left by MartynInEurope at 6/15/2009 2:01 AM Gravatar
*When CEDA engaged in parliamentary manoevres to gain more seats in the government, Alcal-Zamorra dissolved the Corretes in an attempt to prevent it. This again demonstrated to the Right that the republic's vaunted 'democracy' was a sham.

No, the above inferences are incorrect. It wasn't the additional seats in government that lead President Niceto Alcalá-Zamora to call fresh elections, it was the possibility of Gil Robles becoming PM. It wasn't that democracy wasn't working, it was working, it was simply that some factions on the right didn't want so much popular democracy, they didn't want the republic, they disliked the total separation of state and church, and they didn't like the new constitution.

*Five months after the Communist-inflitrated Popular Front won the follwing election, police arrested Calvo Sotelo, leader of the Rightist opposition was murdered by the police and the Socialist party leader's driver with clubs and knives. This taught the Right that even their most prominent statesmen could be murdered at will by the socialist state and its supporters, and that none of them were safe. They had little left to lose.

There was no communist infiltration of the Popular Front, the Communists were openly part of the Popular Front, along with many others.

--- continued ---

# re: Viva La Quinta Brigada

left by MartynInEurope at 6/15/2009 2:02 AM Gravatar


--- continued from above ---

*The Right's religious sensibilities were anatagonised when Sotelo's funeral was attacked (with guns) by Popular front supporters and 4 were killed. The Righrt learned that it was not allowed even to bury its dead with dignity and in safety.

For a more accurate description of the events, I would suggest taking a look at "Por qué y cómo mataron a Calvo Sotelo" by Luis Romero.

The army revolted days later and it is hardly surprising that Rightists did not rise to the defence of the republic, which had never been a true democracy. For police and employees of the government to be able to murder the Leader of the Opposition is not an usual definition of democracy. I doubt many Guardian readers would have defended Britain as a democracy if Neil Kinnock had been murdered by the SPG and the FCS.

Again, you are not being entirely open about what happened. Whilst it is true that Calvo Sotelo was murdered, the murder was an act of revenge for the murder of Lieutenant José del Castillo Sáez de Tejada (member of the socialist party PSOE). Indeed, it is alleged that the murderers of Sotelo actually went after Gil Robles, but not finding him at home, they decided to change the object of their revenge.

The Left provoked the Spanish Civil War and 40 years of Franco's rule with their own anti-democratic behaviour. They brought it upon themselves.

Nope.



Some references (NB in Spanish):

Comments have been closed on this topic.
Untitled 1